List of 2026 Planning Commission Meetings
October 13, 2026
| Agenda |
September 22, 2026
Cancelled — Planning Commission Meeting Notice of Cancelation
September 08, 2026
| Agenda |
August 25, 2026
Cancelled — Planning Commission Meeting Notice of Cancelation
August 11, 2026
Cancelled — Planning Commission Meeting Notice of Cancelation
June 30, 2026
| Planning Commission Special Meeting Agenda |
June 24, 2026
| Special Planning Commission Meeting |
June 23, 2026
| Agenda | Agenda Packet | PC Agenda 062326 |
June 09, 2026
| Agenda | Agenda Packet | Planning Commission Agenda 060926 |
March 31, 2026
| Video | PC_RegularSession_Agenda_03_31_2026 | Transcript | Video Backup |
AI summary
The following summary was generated by an AI model from the meeting's transcript, agenda, and agenda packet, and may contain errors.
Item 1: Call to Order
This item was not taken up at the meeting.
Item 2: Roll Call
Roll Call at [0:00:01].
Item 3: Pledge of Allegiance
Pledge of Allegiance at [0:00:12].
Item 4: Acceptance of the Agenda
The Planning Commission meeting began with a brief moment of patriotism as a speaker, Joseph Banchero, invited attendees to join in the Pledge of Allegiance. a speaker, Daniel Richardson, then led the pledge, reciting the full text. No further discussion or action was taken on Agenda Item 4 during this segment of the meeting.
Keywords: Pledge of Allegiance, Joseph Banchero, Daniel Richardson, Agenda Item 4
Item 6: Public Hearing
The Planning Commission convened a public hearing to consider Resolution No. 04-2026, which recommends that the City Council adopt an ordinance amending the Clayton Municipal Code to allow certain residential developments as "by right" with specific affordable housing requirements. Frank Chow, a senior planner from the City of Naperville, presented the proposal. He explained that the amendment has three key components: allowing sites identified to address shortfalls in the Regional Housing Needs Assessment to be developed by right if at least 20% of the units are affordable to lower-income households; ensuring that minimum density requirements (20 units per acre) take precedence over base zone regulations; and defining "by right" in the municipal code to mean that certain housing developments do not require discretionary approvals such as conditional use permits or plan unit development permits.
Following the presentation, Joseph Banchero moved to approve the resolution, which was seconded by Frank Chow. A vote was taken, with all three commissioners voting in favor. The motion carried unanimously. No further discussion or amendments were proposed, and no additional public comments were received during the hearing. The Planning Commission concluded the meeting without any other business.
Keywords: affordable housing requirements, residential developments, Regional Housing Needs Assessment, minimum density requirements, by right definition, conditional use permits, plan unit development permits
Item 7: Adjournment
Adjournment at [0:11:04].
See the full transcript here.
March 10, 2026
| Agenda | Video | Agenda Packet | PC_RegularSession_Agenda_03_10_2026 | Transcript | Video Backup |
AI summary
The following summary was generated by an AI model from the meeting's transcript, agenda, and agenda packet, and may contain errors.
Item 1: Call to Order
Call to Order at [0:00:21].
Item 2: Roll Call
This item was not taken up at the meeting.
Item 3: Pledge of Allegiance
This item was not taken up at the meeting.
Item 4: Acceptance of the Agenda
This item was not taken up at the meeting.
Item 6: Consent Calendar
This item was not taken up at the meeting.
Item 7: Public Hearing
The Planning Commission continued its public hearing on the Silver Oak Estates Project, focusing on the Environmental Impact Report (EIR), vesting tentative subdivision map, and development plan. Staff outlined the CEQA alternative analysis, which included the no project alternative, a reduced development alternative with 20 units, and a base level alternative with 25 units. The no project alternative was deemed inconsistent with the city’s housing element and general plan objectives. The reduced development alternative was considered environmentally superior due to lower vehicle miles traveled (VMT), but it failed to meet the city’s regional housing needs allocation (RHNA) numbers, making it difficult to support findings for reduced density. Staff emphasized that the proposed project aligns with the city’s housing goals and includes measures to preserve Maud Alba Creek and provide buffer areas for neighbors.
Staff also detailed coordination with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. Consultation occurred during the initial study, draft EIR, and final EIR stages. CDFW provided limited comments, which were incorporated into the EIR, while the Regional Water Quality Control Board had no comments. Pre-construction requirements, such as a stream alteration agreement and biological surveys, will be conducted in cooperation with CDFW. Additionally, a notice of intent to construct will be required from the Regional Water Quality Control Board.
Regarding the Homeowners Association (HOA), staff explained that the HOA will be responsible for maintaining private facilities, including streets, street lights, and bioretention systems. Developers must submit a detailed budget for approval, and if the HOA becomes underfunded, it can levy special assessments to ensure solvency. Staff noted that HOA insolvency is rare due to these mechanisms.
Staff recommended that the Planning Commission approve the project, including certifying the EIR, adopting a mitigation monitoring reporting program, approving the vesting tentative map, and adopting the development plan with subcomponents such as the affordable housing plan and habitat conservation plan. Staff also requested the Commission to adopt findings of fact and conditions of approval for the project.
Keywords: Silver Oak Estates Project, Environmental Impact Report, Regional Housing Needs Allocation, Maud Alba Creek, Homeowners Association, Mitigation Monitoring Program, Affordable Housing Plan
Item 8: Communications
The Planning Commission considered the adoption of Resolution 012-206, which includes the approval of multiple components related to the Silver Oaks Estates project. a speaker moved to approve all items associated with the resolution, including the Mitigation and Monitoring and Reporting Program, the Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map VTS M9541, the development plan DP-01-10, and the findings of fact and conditions of approval for the project. a speaker affirmed the motion, and a speaker seconded it. Following the motion, a speaker requested the city clerk to call the roll for a vote.
Commissioner Brosevich voted in favor (Aye), Commissioner Casagrande opposed (No), Commissioner Schulman supported (Aye), Vice Chair Banchero voted in favor (Aye), and Chair Richardson also supported the motion (Aye). The resolution was approved with a majority vote.
Keywords: Silver Oaks Estates project, Mitigation and Monitoring, Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map, Development Plan DP-01-10, Findings of Fact, Conditions of Approval, Resolution 012-206
Item 9: Adjournment
Adjournment at [0:16:55].
See the full transcript here.
February 24, 2026
| Agenda | Video | Agenda Packet | PC_RegularSession_Agenda_02_24_2026 |
No transcript is available: the recording published by the City for this meeting contains no usable audio.
February 10, 2026
| Agenda | Video | Agenda Packet | PC_RegularSession_Agenda_02_10_2026 | Transcript |
AI summary
The following summary is provided by smmry.com.
TBD
See the full transcript here.
January 13, 2026
| Agenda | Video | Agenda Packet | PC_RegularSession_Agenda_01_13_2026 | Transcript |
AI summary
The following summary is provided by smmry.com.
TBD
See the full transcript here.